Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups

From: David Howells (dhowells@private)
Date: Tue May 17 2005 - 07:08:01 PDT

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Chris Wright <chrisw@private> wrote:

> I see no issue with the keys changes, except I'd rather see key_duplicate
> removed entirely if it's not getting used.  David, is there a plan to
> put it to use, or can Adrian remove it?

There was a keyctl call for it, I thought. I wonder what happened to it. Let
me think about what I want to do with it. Note that if key_duplicate() gets
removed, then the key_type->duplicate() op may as well be rooted out and shot
too.

The rest of the patch looks vaguely okay.

David

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue May 17 2005 - 11:16:23 PDT