Re: [2.6 patch] security/: possible cleanups

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@private)
Date: Mon May 30 2005 - 12:41:31 PDT


On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:08:01PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Chris Wright <chrisw@private> wrote:
> 
> > I see no issue with the keys changes, except I'd rather see key_duplicate
> > removed entirely if it's not getting used.  David, is there a plan to
> > put it to use, or can Adrian remove it?
> 
> There was a keyctl call for it, I thought. I wonder what happened to it. Let
> me think about what I want to do with it. Note that if key_duplicate() gets
> removed, then the key_type->duplicate() op may as well be rooted out and shot
> too.

Have you thought about what to do with key_duplicate()?

> The rest of the patch looks vaguely okay.
> 
> David

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon May 30 2005 - 12:42:04 PDT