On Wed, 25 May 2005, Greg KH wrote: > Hm, I must have missed that discussion. Any pointers to it? Also answering Serge's query, it was not a public discussion, the issue came up when I was talking to a couple of core kernel maintainers about an LSM which was submitted a few weeks ago (from memory). They were also concerned that SELinux is the only significant in-tree user of LSM and that LSM is attracting some (IMHO) inappropriate code submissions into the mainline kernel. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@private>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 17:11:18 PDT