Re: New stacker performance results

From: James Morris (jmorris@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 17:10:47 PDT

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Greg KH wrote:

> Hm, I must have missed that discussion.  Any pointers to it?

Also answering Serge's query, it was not a public discussion, the issue
came up when I was talking to a couple of core kernel maintainers about an
LSM which was submitted a few weeks ago (from memory).  They were also
concerned that SELinux is the only significant in-tree user of LSM and
that LSM is attracting some (IMHO) inappropriate code submissions into the
mainline kernel.

- James
James Morris

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 17:11:18 PDT