Re: New stacker performance results

From: Crispin Cowan (crispin@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 17:25:50 PDT

James Morris wrote:
>Also answering Serge's query, it was not a public discussion, the issue
>came up when I was talking to a couple of core kernel maintainers about an
>LSM which was submitted a few weeks ago (from memory).  They were also
>concerned that SELinux is the only significant in-tree user of LSM and
>that LSM is attracting some (IMHO) inappropriate code submissions into the
>mainline kernel.
What constitutes "inappropriate" here?

Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.            
Director of Software Engineering, Novell

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 17:26:37 PDT