Re: New stacker performance results

From: Crispin Cowan (crispin@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 18:48:05 PDT

Colin Walters wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:23 -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
>>James Morris wrote:
>>>(I would argue that his "truly generic" requirement was fulfilled by 
>>I argue that it definitely does not have such generality. A trivial
>>proof of that is that some setting may require a solution that is much
>>smaller (time, space, etc.) and thus SELinux would fail to qualify
>>precisely because of its generality.
>This is a "proof"?  
SELinux is big, slow, and complicated. Not everyone likes that. QED :)


Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.            
Director of Software Engineering, Novell

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 18:49:09 PDT