Colin Walters wrote: >On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:23 -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > >>James Morris wrote: >> >>>(I would argue that his "truly generic" requirement was fulfilled by >>>SELinux). >>> >>I argue that it definitely does not have such generality. A trivial >>proof of that is that some setting may require a solution that is much >>smaller (time, space, etc.) and thus SELinux would fail to qualify >>precisely because of its generality. >> >This is a "proof"? > SELinux is big, slow, and complicated. Not everyone likes that. QED :) Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Director of Software Engineering, Novell http://novell.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 18:49:09 PDT