On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:23 -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > James Morris wrote: > >(I would argue that his "truly generic" requirement was fulfilled by > >SELinux). > > > I argue that it definitely does not have such generality. A trivial > proof of that is that some setting may require a solution that is much > smaller (time, space, etc.) and thus SELinux would fail to qualify > precisely because of its generality. This is a "proof"?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 18:45:05 PDT