Re: New stacker performance results

From: Chris Wright (chrisw@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 23:00:08 PDT

* Crispin Cowan (crispin@private) wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
> >He wanted to avoid deciding on the "correct" access control model:
> >
> >  
> Indeed, choosing the "correct" module is very difficult, and may be
> impossible, as different settings have different requirements.

Nit-pick...correct model.

And here, I completely agree.  In fact, I suspect the SELinux guys agree
as well.  I think Stephen and James are stating they've created someting
which can adapt to the requirements, and are simply questioning whether
SELinux can supplant LSM as the 'general mechanism.'

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 23:01:18 PDT