Re: New stacker performance results

From: Crispin Cowan (crispin@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 23:04:54 PDT

Chris Wright wrote:
>>Indeed, choosing the "correct" module is very difficult, and may be
>>impossible, as different settings have different requirements.
>Nit-pick...correct model.
Sure, that is an old typo and thinko :)

>And here, I completely agree.  In fact, I suspect the SELinux guys agree
>as well.  I think Stephen and James are stating they've created someting
>which can adapt to the requirements, and are simply questioning whether
>SELinux can supplant LSM as the 'general mechanism.'
That is the notion that I take issue with.

I only said it once before, so for clarity: if having our module in-tree
is what matters, then I am happy to do it.

Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.            
Director of Software Engineering, Novell

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 23:05:30 PDT