Chris Wright wrote: >>Indeed, choosing the "correct" module is very difficult, and may be >>impossible, as different settings have different requirements. >> >Nit-pick...correct model. > Sure, that is an old typo and thinko :) >And here, I completely agree. In fact, I suspect the SELinux guys agree >as well. I think Stephen and James are stating they've created someting >which can adapt to the requirements, and are simply questioning whether >SELinux can supplant LSM as the 'general mechanism.' > That is the notion that I take issue with. I only said it once before, so for clarity: if having our module in-tree is what matters, then I am happy to do it. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Director of Software Engineering, Novell http://novell.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 23:05:30 PDT