Re: New stacker performance results

From: Chris Wright (chrisw@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 23:04:23 PDT


* James Morris (jmorris@private) wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2005, Tony Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:10:47PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > 
> > > Note: out of tree kernel code does not count for anything.  It's not
> > > really part of the Linux kernel.  Mainline maintainers don't care about it
> > > and should not be expected to.  
> > 
> > If I recall correctly LSM was created precisely because Linus didn't care 
> > about security and didn't want to.  In the context of this I don't understand 
> > most of the above.

Yup, more or less.

> My reading is that he didn't want to have to choose the security model, to 
> paint Linux into a particular corner.

More like to keep the other 9 people from complainingly ad nauseum, when
chosing only 1 out of 10.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 23:05:10 PDT