Re: New stacker performance results

From: Stephen Smalley (sds@private)
Date: Thu May 26 2005 - 05:01:00 PDT


On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 23:04 -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> I only said it once before, so for clarity: if having our module in-tree
> is what matters, then I am happy to do it.

That only makes sense if it can be used, i.e. the necessary userspace
tool for configuring it is also available.  Is it still proprietary?

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu May 26 2005 - 06:47:40 PDT