Re: New stacker performance results

From: Stephen Smalley (sds@private)
Date: Thu May 26 2005 - 05:01:00 PDT

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 23:04 -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> I only said it once before, so for clarity: if having our module in-tree
> is what matters, then I am happy to do it.

That only makes sense if it can be used, i.e. the necessary userspace
tool for configuring it is also available.  Is it still proprietary?

Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu May 26 2005 - 06:47:40 PDT