Re: stacker and dummy

From: Tony Jones (tonyj@private)
Date: Mon Jun 27 2005 - 13:45:08 PDT

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: stacker and dummy"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: stacker and dummy"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: stacker and dummy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:42:13PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Tony Jones (tonyj@private) wrote:
> > I'd still like to see dummy go away and capability become the default.
> 
> I would not be opposed to that.  Anyone care about dummy?

cap_stack or capability?

We don't care about cap_inode_setxattr or cap_inode_removexattr but I imagine 
someone does?

Tony

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: stacker and dummy"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: stacker and dummy"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: stacker and dummy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jun 27 2005 - 13:49:27 PDT