Quoting Tony Jones (tonyj@private): > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:59:02AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > > The topic of replacing dummy (with capability) was discussed there > > > last week, in the context of stacker, but a common solution for both > > > cases would be needed. > > > > Both cases? > > CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER and !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER ;-) > > http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2005-June/6200.html > > I was assuming (bad of me I know) that Serge's patch would nail both cases > with one stone. Yes, sorry, I never got around to the replace-dummy-with-capability patch. There wasn't a single cry when Chris asked for anyone who'd care about dummy being removed, so I do plan on switching that. thanks, -serge
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 04 2005 - 23:47:21 PDT