Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional

From: Tony Jones (tonyj@private)
Date: Mon Jul 04 2005 - 00:44:49 PDT 

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:59:02AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:

> > The topic of replacing dummy (with capability) was discussed there
> > last week, in the context of stacker, but a common solution for both
> > cases would be needed.
> 
> Both cases?

CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER and !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER ;-)

http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2005-June/6200.html

I was assuming (bad of me I know) that Serge's patch would nail both cases
with one stone.

Tony

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 04 2005 - 00:49:46 PDT