--- Stephen Smalley <sds@private> wrote: > > Sorry, I'm not going to play that game. > > Then I'll assume your original statement was false. I said I am not going to play that game. > > One man's "ad-hoc hack" is another > > man's "clever solution". > > Possibly, but that doesn't change the > fact that it isn't suitable for mainline. It wasn't that long ago that SELinux had "ad-hoc hack" status in the community. With continued exposure and no small amount of backing from organizations of influence the suitability of SELinux for the main line has been established. I humbly submit that other schemes ought to be allowed the same opportunities that have been available to those behind SELinux. > See the realtime LSM discussions for a > case study. And note > that the objections to it had nothing to do with > SELinux. This is a fine example of your point. > > > - LSMs that lacked any real users. > > > > You're putting a chicken/egg limit > > in with that one. > > Not my limit. Your argument, nonetheless. Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Jul 05 2005 - 08:36:49 PDT