Re: [OT] lsm stacker

From: Timothy R. Chavez (tinytim@private)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 10:19:13 PDT

Previous message: Greg KH: "[PATCH] add securityfs for all LSMs to use"
In reply to: Casey Schaufler: "Re: lsm stacker"
Next in thread: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [OT] lsm stacker"
Reply: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [OT] lsm stacker"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tuesday 05 July 2005 10:34, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> 
> --- Stephen Smalley <sds@private> wrote:

<snip>

> 
> It wasn't that long ago that
> SELinux had "ad-hoc hack"
> status in the community.
> With continued exposure and
> no small amount of backing
> from organizations of
> influence the suitability of
> SELinux for the main line
> has been established. I
> humbly submit that other
> schemes ought to be allowed
> the same opportunities that
> have been available to
> those behind SELinux.

Casey,

There's something inherently wrong with reading technical e-mail like it's 
poetry... :)

-tim

<snip>

Previous message: Greg KH: "[PATCH] add securityfs for all LSMs to use"
In reply to: Casey Schaufler: "Re: lsm stacker"
Next in thread: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [OT] lsm stacker"
Reply: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [OT] lsm stacker"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 10:21:11 PDT