On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 01:17 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Here's a small patch against 2.6.13-rc2 that adds securityfs, a virtual > fs that all LSMs can use instead of creating their own. The fs should > be mounted at /sys/kernel/security, and the fs creates that mount point. > This will make the LSB people happy that we aren't creating a new > /my_lsm_fs directory in the root for every different LSM. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@private> This looks like a great idea but shouldn't this be mounted in proc? lsm is very much about processes and very little about hardware, you'll end up with 2 nebulous filesystems by adding stuff to sys that belongs in proc. Joshua Brindle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 15:18:07 PDT