Re: Questions for the Stacker FAQ

From: Colin Walters (walters@private)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 08:47:48 PDT

Previous message: George Beshers: "Re: Questions for the Stacker FAQ"
In reply to: George Beshers: "Re: Questions for the Stacker FAQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 12:25 -0400, George Beshers wrote:

> However the point about the general short circuit for LSMs is well
> taken---perhaps auditing should be done via a separate interface.

The kernel has an auditing system already; is it not sufficient for you?

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Previous message: George Beshers: "Re: Questions for the Stacker FAQ"
In reply to: George Beshers: "Re: Questions for the Stacker FAQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Jul 12 2005 - 09:58:35 PDT