Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs

From: serue@private
Date: Mon Jul 25 2005 - 11:38:47 PDT

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Next in thread: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Quoting Stephen Smalley (sds@private):
> The patch does call the authorization hooks (e.g.
> security_inode_setxattr) prior to the operation hook (e.g.
> security_inode_setsecurity).  security_inode_post_setxattr is

I was selectively transposing - and + in my head...  sorry.

-serge

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Next in thread: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 12:16:32 PDT