* Stephen Smalley (sds@private) wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 07:58 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > Ok, as with my prior comment, this one is also invalidated by the fact > > that the static inlines fall back to the cap_ functions if the operation > > is NULL. So I suppose this would work. > > Given these changes, what purpose does the capability module and the > CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES option serve anymore? Should capability.c > be removed entirely? I left it for two reasons. Making it built-in will mean you can't load another security module. Some distros use the module already, so it's compatibility. These aren't the best reasons to keep it long term. > Also seems to obsolete the cap_stack module in the stacking patch set. I believe so. thanks, -chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 26 2005 - 09:23:08 PDT