On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:29:58AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 07:58 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > Ok, as with my prior comment, this one is also invalidated by the fact > > that the static inlines fall back to the cap_ functions if the operation > > is NULL. So I suppose this would work. > > Given these changes, what purpose does the capability module and the > CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES option serve anymore? Should capability.c > be removed entirely? Since stacker will implement every hook (preventing the static inline falling thru) wouldn't retaining capability as a module for composition be useful? Of course I can see alternate methods for implementing this. At the very least, as this thread demonstrates, the current stacker approach of calling dummy when no submodule implements a hook will need some rework. Tony
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 26 2005 - 09:37:41 PDT