Quoting Chris Wright (chrisw@private): > > A little surprising: kernbench is improved, but dbench and tbench > > are worse - though within the 95% CI. > > It is interesting. Would be good to see what happens with the cap_ bits > used in SELinux instead of secondary callout. Here are the new numbers next to the originals. 'patchedv2' is obviously with your new patch. Kernbench keeps getting faster :) dbench (throughput, larger is better): original: 357.957780 +/- 3.509188 patched: 351.266820 +/- 4.736168 patchedv2: 352.414880 +/- 3.649639 tbench (throughput, larger is better): original: 38.710270 +/- 0.028970 patched: 38.210506 +/- 0.032954 patchedv2: 38.018038 +/- 0.024762 kernbench (time, smaller is better): original: 91.837000 +/- 0.324471 patched: 91.466000 +/- 0.308797 patchedv2: 91.079000 +/- 0.236836 reaim (#children vs throughput, larger is better): original: 1 48702.197000 1875.223996 3 131411.870000 4497.107969 5 130219.174000 6365.289551 7 162377.027000 3131.071134 9 155432.904000 4964.935291 11 169784.384000 4490.812272 13 164540.169000 3902.652904 15 172983.569000 3149.934591 patched: 1 47525.273000 1509.578035 3 132151.651000 2282.043786 5 131244.291000 5874.212092 7 165629.693000 4646.641230 9 156163.110000 3422.903849 11 170608.526000 4132.988693 13 164863.102000 3664.214481 15 172947.803000 2548.662380 patchedv2: 1 46796.702000 1454.752458 3 126771.430000 3296.287229 5 132779.408000 4786.218275 7 165525.949000 3364.383587 9 156160.772000 3358.822121 11 172681.856000 2524.954098 13 162618.395000 4892.710796 15 172982.170000 3105.761847 > Also, need to run ia64, > do you have an ia64 box? Not a one, I'm afraid. -serge
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 26 2005 - 10:35:39 PDT