Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates

From: Chris Wright (chrisw@private)
Date: Fri Aug 26 2005 - 10:49:56 PDT

Previous message: Tony Jones: "Re: [PATCH] remove selinux stacked ops"
In reply to: serue@private: "Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

* serue@private (serue@private) wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wright (chrisw@private):
> > > A little surprising: kernbench is improved, but dbench and tbench
> > > are worse - though within the 95% CI.
> > 
> > It is interesting.  Would be good to see what happens with the cap_ bits
> > used in SELinux instead of secondary callout.
> 
> Here are the new numbers next to the originals.  'patchedv2' is
> obviously with your new patch.  Kernbench keeps getting faster :)

Thanks again.  Hmm, tbench fell a bit more, reaim is sort of all over
the place.  Do you have a harness for this?  I can run same on hardware
here (in particular I'm interested to do P4 and ia64).

thanks,
-chris

Previous message: Tony Jones: "Re: [PATCH] remove selinux stacked ops"
In reply to: serue@private: "Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 26 2005 - 10:50:29 PDT