Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@private
Date: Wed Nov 16 2005 - 10:45:15 PST

Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
In reply to: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:28:27 EST, James Morris said:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, David Safford wrote:
> 
> > The term, unfortunately seems to have stuck in the literature.  Vista is
> > claiming a similar trusted boot, so perhaps we should keep the term,
> > while trying to be clearer about what it really means.
> 
> Who cares about Vista?

Those of us who, in order to deploy this, will need to get a signature from
a PHB who can spell Vista and heard about trusted boot from a 8.5x11 glossy....

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
In reply to: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Nov 16 2005 - 10:46:19 PST