On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:45:15PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@private wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:28:27 EST, James Morris said: > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, David Safford wrote: > > > > > The term, unfortunately seems to have stuck in the literature. Vista is > > > claiming a similar trusted boot, so perhaps we should keep the term, > > > while trying to be clearer about what it really means. > > > > Who cares about Vista? > > Those of us who, in order to deploy this, will need to get a signature from > a PHB who can spell Vista and heard about trusted boot from a 8.5x11 glossy.... And this affects the kernel code how? Please document what it really does, leave the marketing to others. greg k-h
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Nov 16 2005 - 11:10:22 PST