Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM

From: Serge E. Hallyn (serue@private)
Date: Sat Nov 19 2005 - 05:17:12 PST

Previous message: Tim Fraser: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] SLIM"
In reply to: Mimi Zohar: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Quoting Mimi Zohar (zohar@private):
> global symbol, which introduced an EVM dependency on SLIM.  The problem
> with the .notifier_call was the lack of a MODULE_STATE_GOING notification
> when a module is removed.  As stacker modules can not be removed, I guess

Hmm?  Stacked modules *can* be removed...

-serge

Previous message: Tim Fraser: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] SLIM"
In reply to: Mimi Zohar: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] EVM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sat Nov 19 2005 - 05:18:10 PST