[loganalysis] Re: syslog, was Re: greetingz

From: John Swope (johnsat_private)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 21:28:26 PDT

  • Next message: Matthew Collins: "Re: [loganalysis] Syslog enabled devices"

    After having read the scale of some of the systems/configurations being discussed on the list, I feel pretty cheesy in even mentioning this, but my little Linksys cable/dsl NATing router will send syslog messages to either a unicast address or to the broadcast address of the LAN's ethernet segment.  It works. And if broadcasting works on this $100 toy then I would assume that it will work on bigger/fancier systems.
    
    Just my $0.02.
    
    John
    
    At 13:53 08/10/01 -0700, dgillettat_private wrote:
    >*snip*
    >
    >  [Yes, there are exceptions:  The Cisco 30xx VPN concentrators 
    >(originally Altiga) allow a list, and I've verified that when two 
    >addresses are entered they both receive all entries.]
    >
    >  The thing is, standard syslog uses UDP, so if the log server 
    >hiccups (or needs a reboot, or whatever), the info is lost.  I'm not 
    >sure how far the new syslog-sec proposal goes towards remedying that.
    >
    >  Have people experimented with sending syslog to a broadcast / 
    >multicast destination instead of a single host?  Did it work?
    >
    >David Gillett
    
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 07:49:14 PDT