Hello Tom, Sincere apologies for the delay. syslog-reliable is in process to become an RFC. That means that it has been accepted on the standards track. It is ready for people to implement. :-) On the other hand, the syslog-sign draft is an "Internet Draft". This (very officially) means that it is to be referred to as a "work in progress". Both Alejo and Sweth are correct; it needs review by people who are interested in making sure that we get it 'right'. The Working Group would welcome review of the ID. If you (or anyone else on this list) has time, please look it over and send comments to the Working Group. The IETF page is here: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/syslog-charter.html with additional information here: http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/index.shtml You may want to post your question to the Working Group mailing list. syslog-secat_private I've heard some rumblings from a few people there who are also planning on implementing syslog-reliable. Best of Luck, Chris At 04:15 PM 10/12/2001 -0700, Tom Perrine wrote: >We're starting a new development project for a high-performance syslog >that will also be compatible with the syslog-reliable and syslog-sign >drafts. > >I'd like to find some alternate implementations to test against for >interoperability. > >Any suggestions for any syslogs that support these? > >--tep > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private >For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Oct 21 2001 - 19:53:22 PDT