Syslog-Reliable and Syslog-Sign also need a reference to a NTP based surveying model to make sure that all peers utilized in the Distributed Logging Matrix are synchronous with each other and that after the fact there is some method of proving this. As to the draft cited below - I will critique it and send it back to the WG under a different cover. I have already found at least one instance of a type (ANS instead of ASN.1). I also want to add some technology as well for future evidentiary work with the content of the log data. Todd Glassey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <clonvickat_private> To: "Tom Perrine" <tepat_private>; <loganalysisat_private> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [logs] any syslog implementations of draft-ietf-syslog-reliable? > Hello Tom, > > Sincere apologies for the delay. syslog-reliable is in process > to become an RFC. That means that it has been accepted on the > standards track. It is ready for people to implement. :-) > > On the other hand, the syslog-sign draft is an "Internet Draft". > This (very officially) means that it is to be referred to as a > "work in progress". Both Alejo and Sweth are correct; it needs > review by people who are interested in making sure that we get > it 'right'. The Working Group would welcome review of the ID. > If you (or anyone else on this list) has time, please look it > over and send comments to the Working Group. The IETF page is > here: > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/syslog-charter.html > with additional information here: > http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/index.shtml > > You may want to post your question to the Working Group mailing > list. syslog-secat_private I've heard some rumblings from > a few people there who are also planning on implementing > syslog-reliable. > > Best of Luck, > Chris > > At 04:15 PM 10/12/2001 -0700, Tom Perrine wrote: > > >We're starting a new development project for a high-performance syslog > >that will also be compatible with the syslog-reliable and syslog-sign > >drafts. > > > >I'd like to find some alternate implementations to test against for > >interoperability. > > > >Any suggestions for any syslogs that support these? > > > >--tep > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private > >For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private > For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 22 2001 - 12:04:50 PDT