RE: [logs] Re: Untamperable logs

From: Steve Wray (steve.wrayat_private)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2001 - 16:55:37 PST

Next message: Shane Kerr: "Re: [logs] "Do you Trust you System Logs?""

Previous message: Chris Adams: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
In reply to: Brian Hatch: "[logs] Re: Untamperable logs"
Next in thread: Kohlenberg, Toby: "RE: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Brian Hatch [mailto:loganalysisat_private]
[snip]
> It was running fine when I left, and they were happy.  Unfortunately
> you couldn't exactly run any log analysis tools on the result.  It

Oh I dunno; use a good OCR font...
:)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Shane Kerr: "Re: [logs] "Do you Trust you System Logs?""
Previous message: Chris Adams: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
In reply to: Brian Hatch: "[logs] Re: Untamperable logs"
Next in thread: Kohlenberg, Toby: "RE: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 06 2001 - 09:41:49 PST