RE: [logs] About Windows NT/2000 logs

From: Steve Wray (steve.wrayat_private)
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 12:39:31 PST

  • Next message: Steve Wray: "RE: [logs] About Windows NT/2000 logs"

    > From: dgillettat_private [mailto:dgillettat_private]
    > 
    > On 4 Mar 2002, at 19:19, Steve Wray wrote:
    > 
    > > OMG, after checking, I find that these
    > > log files arn't even text files!
    > > 
    > > How on earth is one supposed to analyse them?
    > > (the provided applet barely counts for log
    > > analysis... If you can't grep the logs they
    > > arn't worth keeping).
    > > 
    > > Maybe theres a setting to make NT/2k/XP
    > > log to text files?
    > 
    >   Their not being text files probably has something to do with the 
    > wide availability of hacker tools called "text editors" that can be 
    > used to arbitrarily change the contents of such files to cover an 
    
    Oh of course! Security thru obscurity; the best sort!
    ;)
    
    > intruder's tracks.  Text files are also often susceptible to 
    > compression ratios of 3:1 or more, particularly if they contain 
    > repetitive data.
    
    I use logrotate with compression. Gzip does a great job.
    
     
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Mar 05 2002 - 12:54:12 PST