Re: [logs] immutable bit

From: Bernie Cosell (bernieat_private)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 10:02:04 PST

  • Next message: Eric Fitzgerald: "[logs] New Windows 2000 Auditing Documentation Available"

    On 15 Mar 2002, at 11:22, Sweth Chandramouli wrote:
    
    > 	Also, what are people's takes on using these mechanisms
    > on log files?  I tend to set append-only on them, although that requires
    > some mild kludgery to twiddle the attr before/after log rotation; I don't
    > know that it provides much extra security, however, given that the files
    > are already owned by root, and thus anyone who could tamper with them
    > could also twiddle turn off the append-only attr.
    
    this is, of course, the security-achilles-heel of Unix -- that it has 
    "one bit" security: either your root is safe [and then minimal security 
    provisions are fine], or you're root-compromised [and then virtually 
    NOTHING will save you].  Mostly I agree: make the files 600/root and be 
    done with it.
    
      /Bernie\
    
    -- 
    Bernie Cosell                     Fantasy Farm Fibers
    mailto:bernieat_private     Pearisburg, VA
        -->  Too many people, too few sheep  <--          
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 10:14:58 PST