Re[2]: [logs] Log archival

From: Richard Welty (rweltyat_private)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 14:04:56 PST

  • Next message: Martin Harriss: "Re: [logs] Log archival"

    On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:40:02 +0100 Rainer Gerhards <rgerhardsat_private> wrote:
    
    > > I've read around that several implementations support some 
    > > sort of hash for modification detection, could someone point 
    > > me to the specs for these hash systems? are they based on a 
    > > standard (rfc?)
    > 
    > There is a RFC on MD5
    > 
    >     http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1321.txt
    > 
    > However, I wonder if MD5 will acutally help in court as long it is not
    > protected inside a crypt sig - somebody out there with an opinion on
    > this?
    
    depends on the circumstances. in normal deployment in IPSec or SSL, you
    would use HMAC-MD5 or HMAC-SHA1, which are signed, and thus provide
    authentication of the source as well as modification detection.
    
    tje hmac algorithm is covered in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2104.txt
    
    richard
    --
    Richard Welty                                         rweltyat_private
    Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
                  Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysisat_private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 11 2002 - 14:44:59 PST