Re: [logs] Log archival

From: Tom Perrine (tepat_private)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 16:04:30 PST

  • Next message: erinat_private: "Re: [logs] Log archival"

    >>>>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:47:57 -0600, "Orin Kerr" <okerrat_private> said:
    
        OK> The only problem comes up when records are 
        OK> not kept "in the course of a regularly conducted 
        OK> business activity."  Example: sysadmin sees an 
        OK> intrusion and uses some commands to generate 
        OK> logs about the intrusion.  The sysadmin has 
        OK> never actually used the commands before-- for 
        OK> some reason, the particular logging is unusual. 
    
    This has implications for systems that want to do a detection of
    "something happened" and having that automatically adjust the log
    level, or what is being logged.  This would be an automated process
    creating a logging "profile" that might never have existed before.
    This has implications for all kinds of intrusion detection systems
    that incorporate active reponse to adjust monitoring criteria.
    
        OK> Now imagine that the government (in a criminal 
        OK> case) or the victim (in a civil case) offers the logs 
        OK> as evidence in court.  If the logs are offered 
        OK> under the business records exception, the 
        OK> defense can counter that the logs were not kept 
        OK> in the ordinary course of business, and should be 
        OK> ruled inadmissible. "Your honor," he will say, "this 
        OK> logging had never been performed before, and it 
        OK> was not the ordinary practice of the victim to keep 
        OK> such logs." In such a case, the court could rule 
        OK> that the evidence could *not* be admitted under 
        OK> the business records exception.  
    
    Aha, that's the piece that was stuck in my mind.  "In the ordinary
    course of business".
    
    OK, I've kept *every single log record* for every UNIX machine we own,
    since December 1996.  3.4 Billion of 'em.  We keep complete,
    unfiltered logs in the normal course of business.  Forever.
    
    In the hopes that if we ever really need them, they'll be admissible,
    hopefully the "easy way".  If not, that's what *our* lawyers are for,
    and why we want to make sure that "our" lawyers are comfortable with
    digitial evidence...
    
    -- 
    Tom E. Perrine <tepat_private> | San Diego Supercomputer Center 
    http://www.sdsc.edu/~tep/     | 
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysisat_private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 12 2002 - 16:21:42 PST