2003-01-09T04:22:37 Balazs Scheidler: > * the use of RFC3164 timestamp should not be forbidden (it is easy to decide > whether RFC3164 or RFC3339 timestamp is there) Sorta concur, although if we're not going to forbid RFC 3164 timestamps, perhaps we should mention their grave defects (no year, no timezone) to motivate people to make the Right choice:-). > * we should not discuss character sets, we should only state that the MSG > part is transmitted 8bit clean Disagree; if we're not going to prohibit anything outside of US-ASCII, I think we should briefly discuss charset issues in a Security Considerations section. If MSG is guaranteed 8bit clean transport, and implementors don't consider charset issues, there _Will_ be security consequences. -Bennett
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 09 2003 - 15:20:29 PST