Bennet Todd wrote: > If we allow MSGs that include CRLFs within them, we're also > accepting that outputting these records in a straight text file is a > lossy operation; and that in turn means that it's easy to send a > message that "forges" a log entry in the file. Why can't the transport simply escape the CRLFs & handle dumping to text the same way? Cheers, Frank. _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 10 2003 - 09:49:37 PST