2003-01-10T20:52:05 Darren Reed: > A quick comment on simple-event-log-protocol.txt - what happened > to section 3 ? > > It appears to go "2. Transport Layer Protocol" then "4.1 SELP > Message parts", which seems somewhat odd. > > The document doesn't clearly express what the combined end result of all > the fields is meant to look like as output. While the timestamp does come > after the PRI field, what about the HOSTNAME field ? I believe all of the above are addressed by the last paragraph of section 1. Introduction: I DO NOT INTEND TO DUPLICATE [RFC3164] HERE. As such, this memo lists only the differences to [RFC3164]. I am using the original chapter numbers to list them. That very definitely seems to me like the right approach to be taking at this point. If ever we decide we want to try to push this through IETF into a real RFC (and I wouldn't begin to try until we can demonstrate, with a load of working implementations while there are none for RFC 3195, that the gap between 3164 and 3195 needs filling in), then might be the time to do a merge of 3164 and selp.txt to produce a standalone spec. -Bennett
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 13 2003 - 09:46:32 PST