Serge, just a quick note, need to leave soon. I am tracking implementations here: http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/rfcs/3195.html I intend to poll the rfc3195 for new additions. I just wanted to wait a little for the initial subscriptions (looks good so far). Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Wroclawski [mailto:serge@private] > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 11:29 PM > To: Rainer Gerhards > Cc: loganalysis@private > Subject: Re: [logs] new mailing list targeted towards rfc > 3195 (sylsog reliable) > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > > I know my posting is slightly off-topic, but hopefully tolerable. > > > Syslog is currently being evolved by the IETF. Among > others, some time > > ago RFC 3195 tried to address reliability and confidentiality of > > syslog. So far, RFC 3195 has received very limited implementations. > > However, I notice a rising interest during the past months. > > Thank goodness! > > > In order to facilitate exchange between those interested in > in RFC 3195, > > I have set up a mailing list specifically for implementors > and users. > > So, maybe you'll peak my and others' interests if you can > tell me about > actual implementations of RFC3195 ala BEEP Syslog ala the > Brazil RFC[1]. > > - Serge Wroclawski > > [1] I don't know anyone else who calls it that, but the RFC > makes too many > references to the movie not to mention it. > > > _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysis@private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 25 2005 - 17:36:34 PDT