[logs] Re: Which reports are most important?

Previous message: todd glassey: "[logs] Re: Which reports are most important?"
In reply to: Chris Edsall: "[logs] Re: Which reports are most important?"
Next in thread: Anton Chuvakin: "[logs] Re: Which reports are most important?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

todd.glassey@private

Which would fit into COBIT's Systems Availability Focus Area directly. Thus
any report showing systems availability would be a good thing for the
Auditors... I rest my case.

Todd

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Edsall" <c.edsall@private>
To: <LogAnalysis@private>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: [logs] Re: Which reports are most important?

> Hi,
>
> I haven't seen hardware problems in anyone's lists yet. (Although it
> would come under bottom 5 or unexpected messages). Failed raid members
> and the like...
>
> -- 
> Chris Edsall   PGP KeyID 873A97AB <c.edsall@private>
> _______________________________________________
> LogAnalysis mailing list
> LogAnalysis@private
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis

_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis@private
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis