[logs] Re: hosts to central logging servers efficiency: syslog orsyslog-ng

From: ScottO (skippylou@private)
Date: Thu May 25 2006 - 04:54:33 PDT


Hi Ernst,

Thanks for the reply.  I think you might have confused my question or 
mabye I didn't word it correctly.  I have the ability to run syslog-ng 
on every device (no firewalls, or other devices, currently to get logs 
from as part of this current project).  So it is more of a: is it better 
to install ng on all those hosts to have the tcp ability and filtering 
capabilities on each individual host, or leave syslog and send to edges 
via udp, then let the edges filter before sending it to the central 
(with edges & central running syslog-ng).

Thanks,

Scott

Ernst Mellink wrote:
> Hi Scott
> 
> Here are my insights into this matter:
> 
> 1) there quite some network and security devices which have a build-in 
> syslog feature and there is no way of actually moving those them over to
> -ng.
> The best yopu can do put preasure on the vendor to add -ng support.
> So a simple solution would be to build a kind of a syslogd to syslog-ng
> bridge node
> This d-ng bridge can do whatever you want it to do:
> 
>>serve multiple destinations either on -d or -ng
>>filter-out certain severities (eg debug messages)
>>rewrite the logformat (however unadvisable)
>>add timestamps to it (if wanted / needed) 
> 
> etc
> 
> 2) in widely scattered networks such a bridge can act like a concentrator.
> There are lots of local connections to the concentrator using either -d or
> -ng
> All possible firewall-problems can be solved locally (nice)
> While the way up into the central server can be a thightly screened and
> secured 
> (why not add ssl-tunneling or do syslog-tls) tcp connections which can be 
> described by the security enigineers and entered into the firewall/ips.
> Ans yes this tcp-connection can be beefed up to dimensions like 100Mbps or 
> whatever is needed without ever losing a single message.
> The suggested term could be area-concentrator
> 
> Such a construction solves 
> A) protocol-translation (udp to tcp)
> B) large firewall-rulessets
> C) concentrates security 
> D) forgo replacing syslogd services if at ever possible
> 
> My 2 cents 
> 
> Ir. Ernst J. Mellink
> IT Security Architect
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis@private
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri May 26 2006 - 13:11:49 PDT