[logs] Re: on log standards

From: James Turnbull (james@private)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2006 - 21:47:12 PDT


Anton Chuvakin wrote:
> He-he, and how exactly do you pressure, say, IBM :-), into documenting
> all the log messages? Some companies (like Cisco) are pretty good at
> that while others are pretty abysmal. At the same time, there is no
> way to document all Unix syslog messages (and Windows event log
> messages) since everybody and their doc can write there ...
>   
In addition to all the messages that no one knows the meaning of.  Lot's 
of mystery messages, even in major products, introduced and not documented.

Regards

James Turnbull

-- 
James Turnbull <james@private>
---
Author of Pro Nagios 2.0
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/)

Hardening Linux
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/)
---
PGP Key (http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0C42DF40)

_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis@private
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Aug 31 2006 - 21:59:21 PDT