On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:08:31AM -0500, David Parrish wrote: > If I can get Owl 3 working with guest additions then I'll probably add > RPMs to give me a basic LAMP stack. All I really care about at that > point is the versions of the running applications. Which is why I am > wondering if a version of CentOS with close version numbers to what WE > runs would have been a smarter strategy. It very much depends on your specific needs, which I can't guess from what was said so far. Here's yet another option: install Owl 3 (or better yet - Owl-current) into a VM, then create OpenVZ containers inside that - including possibly cloning (e.g. with tar over ssh) your remote WebEnabled VPS into a container like this. Note that Owl 3+ has OpenVZ support out of the box (unlike Owl 2). WebEnabled host servers actually run Owl 3 (or very similar). In fact, the OpenVZ specific screenshots here: http://www.openwall.com/Owl/screenshots were taken from an Owl system running in a VM. AlexanderReceived on Mon Dec 17 2012 - 22:20:03 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 17 2012 - 22:21:38 PST