I was under the impression that the different environmental subsystems could not interact at all -- I know *you* [ as a programmer ] can't make win32 API calls at all from a program that runs under the POSIX or OS/2 subsystem...and the same applies for POSIX / OS/2 calls from the win32 subsystem. But then..maybe that doesn't apply to the code that actually implements the subsytem. *shruggs* While on the subject...anybody have any documentation on how to *write* a subsystem. AFAIK it doesn't exsists...but if you take a look at the Fluke project over at MIT [ don't have the url handy, but it's supposed to be the successor to Mach ] -- the main strength of the OS is it's ability to emmulate other operating systems via what are called 'OSLibs' -- which, do a certain extent, resemble NT's environmental subsystems. IMHO, running Outlook on NT is a waste of a perfectly good micro-kernel based archetecure. --c0ncept [snip] Some of the POSIX subsystem calls turn around and call Win32, while others call the NT native API directly, but none of that really matters (in theory, anyway) because all the security is implemented and enforced internally by the executive components of the kernel. pty [snip]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 17 2001 - 16:01:04 PDT