Would you not have had an NDA with your client and should this not have been covered under such an NDA? It should be up to your client to take action on this one. On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 sarafat_private wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:04:04 -0800 > From: sarafat_private > To: pen-testat_private > Subject: Thankyou > > > To everyone who sent me mail on my earlier topic thankyou. We are working > with two of the vendors now and will contact the third shortly. The machine > FWIW was shut down as soon as we discovered the issue and the client > was notified. > > sara > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > gpg: Warning: using insecure memory! > gpg: Signature made Wed 26 Mar 2003 04:08:23 PM CST using DSA key ID 508994DB > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" hellNbakat_private http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway. SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial: http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 27 2003 - 08:58:43 PST