Re: udp_forge: uh_ulen or uh_len?

From: Renaud Deraison (deraisonat_private)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 08:14:38 PST

Next message: sulloat_private: "Re: nmap & nessus"

Previous message: Michael Scheidell: "udp_forge: uh_ulen or uh_len?"
In reply to: Michael Scheidell: "udp_forge: uh_ulen or uh_len?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:10:02AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Starting to see what differ3ences/bugs/fixes there are in nessus 1.2.7 vs
> 1.3.4 plugins.
> 
> It seems that there are several bugfixes in 1.3.4 that didn't make it to
> 1.2.7 cvs.
> I will try to create a diff an dpost to bugs laster.
> 
> in the function forge_udp_packet, I have seen params passed with uh_ulen
> (in nessus 1.3.4 and nessus 1.2.7) and in nessus 1.2.7 there is both
> uh_ulen and uh_len
> 
> It seems that uh_len param is a bug? as it was removed, cleaned from
> 1.3.4? or does nasl take both params?

It's uh_ulen. Everything else is a bug.

				-- Renaud

Next message: sulloat_private: "Re: nmap & nessus"
Previous message: Michael Scheidell: "udp_forge: uh_ulen or uh_len?"
In reply to: Michael Scheidell: "udp_forge: uh_ulen or uh_len?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 22 2003 - 08:15:02 PST