RE: Feature Request

From: Discini, Sonny (Sonny.Disciniat_private)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:40:22 PST

Next message: Steven Procter: "Re: Major remote root vunerability found in sendmail"

Previous message: Renaud Deraison: "Re: Feature Request"
Maybe in reply to: Discini, Sonny: "Feature Request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thanks!


-----Original Message-----
From: Renaud Deraison [mailto:deraisonat_private] 
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:36 PM
To: plugins-writersat_private
Subject: Re: Feature Request


On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:23:00PM -0500, Discini, Sonny wrote:
> Is there any way that we can get a "-n" switch added to the nasl 
> command line utility so that we can run individual nasls without 
> safechecks? This would be handy when testing for false positives or 
> buggy nasls.

In Nessus 2.0 :

	nasl -s foo.nasl	-> safe checks enabled
	nasl foo.nasl		-> safe checks disabled

Next message: Steven Procter: "Re: Major remote root vunerability found in sendmail"
Previous message: Renaud Deraison: "Re: Feature Request"
Maybe in reply to: Discini, Sonny: "Feature Request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:40:36 PST