Re: Feature Request

From: Renaud Deraison (deraisonat_private)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:36:15 PST

Next message: Discini, Sonny: "RE: Feature Request"

Previous message: Renaud Deraison: "Re: Major remote root vunerability found in sendmail"
In reply to: Discini, Sonny: "Feature Request"
Next in thread: Discini, Sonny: "RE: Feature Request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:23:00PM -0500, Discini, Sonny wrote:
> Is there any way that we can get a "-n" switch added to the nasl command
> line utility so that we can run individual nasls without safechecks?
> This would be handy when testing for false positives or buggy nasls. 

In Nessus 2.0 :

	nasl -s foo.nasl	-> safe checks enabled
	nasl foo.nasl		-> safe checks disabled

Next message: Discini, Sonny: "RE: Feature Request"
Previous message: Renaud Deraison: "Re: Major remote root vunerability found in sendmail"
In reply to: Discini, Sonny: "Feature Request"
Next in thread: Discini, Sonny: "RE: Feature Request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:36:46 PST