Doh! I should have thought of this. I just have to hope that the source port I chose is not in use. > ---------- > From: Renaud Deraison[SMTP:deraisonat_private] > Sent: 13 May 2003 15:38 > To: 'plugins-writersat_private' > Subject: Re: arbitrary TCP data packets > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:18:48PM +0200, Michel Arboi wrote: > > Renaud Deraison <deraisonat_private> writes: > > > > > The thing is that no operating system offers a really nice interface > to > > > gather that kind of information. > > > > OK for sequence numbers, IP ID and things like that. > > Which is what we are interested in. > > > But source port can be read with getsockname() > > Sure. But if that's what we wanted, we could always use > open_priv_sock_tcp() with a forced source port argument. > > > -- Renaud > This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 13 2003 - 08:03:28 PDT