Hiya chaps, Is there a standard consensus to dealing with looking for UDP and TCP services on all listening ports (for the occasions when they are configured on non-standard ports)? The two problem scenarios I want to address are: - A server (TCP & UDP) that requires an explicit source port (random source elicits no response) which may not get picked up by the port scanning module. - A UDP server that needs a specific payload before it responds (wrong payload elicits no response). As a worst case I can simply enumerate all the ports, but if the target is silently dropping packets, then the script will take a small eternity to complete. Thoughts? Regards, Martin O'Neal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Corsaire Limited, unless otherwise specifically stated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Corsaire Limited, 3 Tannery House, Tannery Lane, Send, Surrey, GU23 7EF Telephone: +44(0)1483-226000 Email:info@private _______________________________________________ Plugins-writers mailing list Plugins-writers@private http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/plugins-writers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 24 2004 - 08:16:45 PDT