FC: Geeks want to "Free Dmitry" -- but Congress says keep him in jail

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Wed Jul 25 2001 - 07:24:10 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: GOP legislators to Supremes: Save our anti-Internet porn law!"

    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,45522,00.html
    
       Congress No Haven for Hackers
       By Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
       
       2:00 a.m. July 25, 2001 PDT
       
       WASHINGTON -- Even as the world's geeks march against the Digital
       Millennium Copyright Act, key legislators and lobbyists are dismissing
       concerns about the controversial law as hyperbole.
       
       The law that led to the arrest of Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov
       last week and an immediate outcry among programmers continues to enjoy
       remarkably broad support on Capitol Hill. No bill has yet been
       introduced in Congress to amend the DMCA for one simple reason:
       Official Washington loves the law precisely as much as hackers and
       programmers despise it.
          
       "The law is performing the way we hoped," said Rep. Howard Coble
       (R-North Carolina), chairman of the House Judiciary subcommittee on
       intellectual property.
       
       The FBI arrested Sklyarov last week in Las Vegas for allegedly
       "trafficking" in software that circumvents the copy protection
       techniques that Adobe uses in its e-book format. Under the DMCA,
       selling such software is a federal felony punishable by up to five
       years in prison and a fine of $500,000.
       
       "As far as I know there have been very few complaints from
       intellectual property holders," Coble, the chief sponsor of the DMCA,
       said in an interview Tuesday. "I am also encouraged by the Department
       of Justice's actions in this matter to enforce the law."
       
       When Congress approved the DMCA in October 1998 after about a year's
       worth of little-noticed debate and negotiations, it was hardly a
       controversial bill. The Senate agreed to it unanimously, and a
       unanimous House approved it by voice vote, then bypassed a procedural
       step that would have delayed the DMCA's enactment.
       
       Since the House procedure says attempts to rewrite copyright law must
       start in Coble's subcommittee, the odds of a DMCA rewrite in Congress'
       lower chamber seem remote.
       
       Coble's counterpart in the Senate, California Democrat Dianne
       Feinstein, feels the same way.
       
       "We need to protect copyrights and this law was designed to do that,"
       said Howard Gantman, a spokesman for Feinstein, who chairs the Senate
       Judiciary subcommittee on technology. "She's not looking to change
       it."
    
       [...]
       
       But in the world of Washington politics, geektivists are woefully
       outnumbered by the natives who populate and influence confirmation
       hearings: Corporate, nonprofit and trade association lobbyists.
       
       "We believe that a careful effort was made by Congress to balance the
       rights of intellectual property owners and the rights of intellectual
       property consumers," says Allan Adler, vice president at the
       Association of American Publishers, which applauded Sklyarov's arrest
       last week.
    
       [...]
       
       The Free-Dmitry movement argues that programmers should not be
       prosecuted for creating software that can circumvent copyright
       protection -- since such tools have many legitimate uses, such as
       reading an e-book on another computer, as well.
       
       But DMCA aficionados say there are precedents for broad prohibitions
       on selling devices that can have both legitimate and illegitimate
       uses.
       
       Current federal law makes it a felony to own, distribute or advertise
       for sale bugging or wiretapping devices that are "primary useful for
       the purpose of surreptitious interception of wire, oral or electronic
       communications." That applies even to parents who might want to
       monitor what their young children are doing, or to other commonplace
       uses.
       
       You're also not allowed to possess hardware or software such as cell
       phone cloning devices that let you "obtain telecommunications service
       without authorization" -- even if your motives are pure.
    
       [...]
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 25 2001 - 07:29:56 PDT