FC: 2600 Australia assails "cybercrime" legislation

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Tue Jul 24 2001 - 18:19:18 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Geeks want to "Free Dmitry" -- but Congress says keep him in jail"

    [Hey, whatever happened to ASCII text and HTML versions? --Declan]
    
    
    ----- Forwarded message from Grant Bayley <gbayleyat_private> -----
    
    From: Grant Bayley <gbayleyat_private>
    Subject: 2600 Australia Cybercrime Bill 2001 Inquiry Submission
    To: <linkat_private>
    Cc: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>, <mackiat_private>,
    	<cryptographyat_private>
    Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:01:40 +1000 (EST)
    
    2600 Australia would like to announce the public release of its
    submission to the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation
    Commitee inquiry into the provisions of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001.
    
    	http://www.2600.org.au/Cybercrime-Submission.pdf  (121k)
    	http://www.2600.org.au/Cybercrime-Submission.doc  (91k)
    
    (This release has been authorised by the Secretary to the Committee as at
    24th July, 2001)
    
    Included here is the Executive Summary:
    
    a. 2600 Australia believes the term "cybercrime" is so broadly defined
       and so frequently misdefined that legislation such as the Cybercrime
       Bill, 2001 will fail to achieve the desired result if only through
       failure to address some issues and through the addition of unnecessary
       complexity to existing laws.
    
    b. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill,
       2001 place in grave danger the robust debate, discussion and
       disclosure that the computer security industry relies so heavily upon.
    
    c. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill,
       2001 will unintentionally place a significant number of computer
       security industry professionals at risk because of poorly defined or
       overly broad definitions of certain acts, objects and intentions.
    
    d. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill,
       2001 place in grave danger the common law privilege against self
       incrimination.
    
    e. 2600 Australia believes that an alternative response to the perceived
       threat of "cybercrime" is required, including but not limited to
       additional training for law enforcement, more rigorous ACCC scrutiny of
       security claims made in respect of products and services and the
       formation of a national body to oversee computer security matters.
    
    f.  For these reasons and others as discussed below, 2600 Australia canot
        support the passage of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 in its current or any
        substantially similar form.
    
    Grant Bayley
    
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Grant Bayley                         gbayleyat_private
    -Admin @ AusMac Archive, Wiretapped.net, 2600 Australia
     www.ausmac.net   www.wiretapped.net   www.2600.org.au
    -------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ----- End forwarded message -----
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 18:59:02 PDT